| By A N Shanbhag
|
Last week's article dealt with the concept of House Rent Allowance (HRA) as also the fact that it is possible to claim both the HRA deduction as well as the deduction on interest on home loan in case where the taxpayer also had an ownership flat.
In other words, HRA and home loan provisions are two different issues as far as the Income Tax Act (ITA) is concerned and one does not influence the other. So, the taxpayer may own any number of flats, either in the same city that he works in or anywhere else in the whole of India or for that matter abroad - this in no way influences the HRA deduction that he is entitled to. The only condition to claim the HRA deduction is that one should be paying rent for the roof over one's head.
A number of readers wrote in with questions based on the above and the following is a selection of the most commonly raised issues. The most common request is to do with the specific section number of the Income Tax Act (ITA) that allows this.
Sensex @ 17k: What should investors do?
For example, a reader says that his company doesn't allow both deductions simultaneously, so if the specific circular or notification could be provided; it will help him convince his employer.
Well, we are afraid that is not possible. The ITA need not expressly allow something - lack of express disallowance also signifies intention of approval. HRA is dealt with by Sec. 10(13A) read with Rule 2A. Interest on housing loan is deductible under Sec. 24. Nowhere does it say either in Sec. 10(13A) or in Sec. 24 that the two are mutually exclusive. Examples of this concept are many.
When should you sell your mutual fund
Let us take for instance Sec. 80C (PPF, NSC, ELSS etc.) and Sec. 80D (medical insurance premium). Everyone will agree that both Sec. 80C and Sec. 80D can be separately claimed. But does it expressly say so anywhere? On the other hand, Sec. 80GG dealing with deduction on rent paid where the taxpayer doesn't receive HRA, specifically mentions that the taxpayer or his or her spouse / minor children should not own any residential accommodation where the taxpayer resides, performs the duties of his office or employment or carries out his business or profession. The section goes on to further add that if the taxpayer owns accommodation at a place other than that mentioned above, the tax deduction in respect of self occupied property (annual value to be taken as nil) should not be claimed by him. This is express denial. No such provisions exist in respect of HRA.
Another interesting point raised is that the deduction of HRA going hand in hand with that on self occupied property seems paradoxical as an employee staying in a rented house, by definition, cannot live in a self occupied property. In other words, a person cannot be at two places at one time or how can a property be self-occupied when the occupant is actually occupying another rented property? To resolve this dilemma, we need to examine Sec. 23(2) of the ITA.
How to compute income from your house property
As per this section, the term "self occupied property" includes property that cannot be occupied by the owner owing to his employment, business or profession carried on at any other place in a building not belonging to him. In other words, it is not necessary that you have to be occupying or staying in the property, rather, the property should be meant for your occupation.
Some readers have inquired whether it is possible to pay rent to one's parents. In other words, since having to pay rent is a pre-requisite for the HRA deduction, can one pay rent to say one's father and claim the deduction? Yes, this can be done.
However, the rent paid to the parent will be added to parent's income and taxed in his or her hands. Also, the taxpayer will have to furnish rent receipts to his employer as proof of having paid rent. Note that this arrangement however cannot be carried out in the case of the spouse.
New Direct Tax Code is harsh on NRIs
Married couples sometimes buy the house in the name of one spouse and the other spouse paying rent. In this case, the other spouse cannot get away paying rent to the owner spouse, as husband and wife cannot have a commercial relationship with each other.
On similar lines, some querists have asked whether rent may be paid to a parent where the property is jointly owned by the taxpayer and the parent. Such a transaction though theoretically feasible, will be in form and substance assumed to be meant as a tax evasion mechanism and hence not advisable.
Lastly, there does exist a related provision that is less commonly known and also hitherto not been discussed. However, this has not so much to do with HRA and the deduction on interest on home loans as it has with regards to the system of taxation of self occupied property. Readers would know that the annual value of one self-occupied property is taken to be nil and the interest deductible there under is capped at Rs. 1.50 lakh. Also as discussed above, such property need not actually be occupied by the owner, rather it should be meant for self occupation.
However, this inability to occupy the property should arise by reason of the fact the employment or business or profession is carried out at some other place. So suppose Sanjay, owns a house but continues to reside with his parents who live in the same neighbourhood.
In other words, Sanjay's own house is vacant not out of any professional or business compulsion but out of choice and personal convenience. In such a case, the annual value of the self-occupied house will not be taken as nil; instead it will be deemed to be let out and the notional rent will be brought to tax.
Consequently, the full amount of the interest on housing loan will be tax deductible without any cap. Needless to add, if Sanjay were to pay rent to his parents, the HRA deduction will continue to apply.
The authors may be contacted at wonderlandconsultants@yahoo.