Copy the embed code below and paste it into your blog or webpage.
|Big funds seek to rein in pay at Wall Street banks||REUTERS|
|The days when Wall Street banks could blithely hand out half their revenue in compensation to their staff without a murmur from shareholders have come to an end.
In an era of leaner times and tighter regulation, big mutual funds and pensions are growing more vocal in pushing executives at investment banks to rein in pay and bonuses and consider more staff cuts. Investors worry that bank employees are getting too big a piece of a shrinking pie, leaving shareholders a much smaller slice.
So far, much of the jousting is taking place behind closed doors. But the debate over whether investment banks should keep devoting roughly 50 percent of revenue to employee compensation is starting to enter the public realm through proxy battles and as more large shareholders speak out on the issue.
"Sometimes executives are being rewarded immensely for just sitting in their chairs, just coming into work every day," said Aeisha Mastagni, an investment officer at California State Teachers' Retirement System, which manages $154 billion in assets. "There is a need to conform to truly performance-based compensation."
Wall Street pay was not a big concern to investors when investment banks were highly profitable and shareholders were reaping benefits too, Mastagni and other investors said. But large shareholders are becoming more vocal because earnings no longer justify compensation at pre-financial crisis levels.
Last year, Morgan Stanley executives came under fire during some investor meetings, according to one person who attended those meetings but was not allowed to discuss them.
At one meeting, he said, "furious" representatives from mutual funds who were among the bank's 10 biggest investors sharply questioned executives, including the chief financial officer and head of investor relations, asking why Morgan Stanley could not cut compensation to about 30 percent of revenues.
Wesley McDade, a spokesperson for Morgan Stanley, which has paid out 51 percent of revenue for compensation the past two years, did not initially offer a comment on the matter.
But later on Thursday, Morgan Stanley Chief Executive James Gorman told the Financial Times that the bank was planning to consider lowering pay and bonuses in its next round of cost-cutting.
"There's way too much capacity and compensation is way too high," Gorman was quoted as saying.
Gorman told the paper that traditionally Wall Street kept compensation ratios flat when revenues went up but increased the ratio when times were bad, arguing they needed to retain people.
"That's a classic Wall Street case of 'Heads I win; tails, you lose'. The current Wall Street management is a little tougher-minded about that and shareholders are certainly tougher-minded," he told the paper.
When asked about Gorman's comments, McDade, the bank spokesman, said he did not dispute the Financial Times story.
Jeff Harte, an equity research analyst at boutique investment bank Sandler O'Neill, who often organizes meetings between investment bank executives and investors, said compensation has been "a theme in management meetings."
"Investors are saying, 'We're past the crisis; you guys still have low returns'," Harte added. "At what point do you admit that this is the new normal?"
Mastagni said some large Wall Street banks, such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc
"I'm not sure that we could agree with the fact that 50 percent of the revenue should be going to the employee base," said Mastagni. "That's just very difficult for us to come to grips with."
With tougher talk from big shareholders, the balance of power may be shifting from bank employees who use capital to the asset managers who supply it. The longer banks suffer from weak earnings, the harder it will be to ignore shareholders on pay.
Bank executives have been delaying big changes to staff levels or compensation for as long as possible, hoping economic growth will pick up and trading volume will rise.
Wall Street banks say they are worried that if they slash compensation, top talent may flee for hedge funds and private equity firms. If they cut staff, it can be more expensive to add workers again when markets improve. Also, layoffs can actually boost near-term compensation costs because of severance.
But investors say the problems keeping profits down may be more permanent than banks acknowledge. In addition to the weak economy and low trading volumes, new regulations and higher capital requirements have cut into returns in fixed income and equity trading.
Trouble in trading is one of the biggest factors behind depressed bank earnings. It was a big reason Goldman Sachs earned just $4.4 billion last year, a 60 percent decline from fiscal 2007.
Those earnings represented a 6.6 percent return on common equity - a measure of how effectively the bank wrings profit from its balance sheet by comparing net income to common equity. Investment banks have historically aimed for more than 15 percent.
"People are starting to get the idea that investment banks right now aren't run for the investors - they're run for the bankers," said Ralph Cole, a portfolio manager at Ferguson Wellman Capital Management, which manages $3.2 billion.
PRESSURE IS ON
Compensation is the biggest expense for most investment banks, so cutting pay is a logical way to boost returns.
But for Goldman to have earned a 15 percent return on equity last year, it would have had to pay just 15 percent of its revenue to employees - far less than the 42 percent it did pay.
Wall Street executives contend that cutting pay to even 30 percent of revenue would cause a massive flight of talent and evaporate profits, hurting shareholders even more.
But many investors have little patience with these arguments. If employees cannot generate high enough returns for their banks, their pay should be cut, multiple hedge fund, mutual fund and pension fund investors told Reuters.
Some shareholders have taken dramatic steps.
Nelson Pelt z's Tr ia n Fund Management LP acquired a 5 percent stake in investment bank Lazard Ltd
At Citigroup Inc
Some banks have conceded that times have changed. Deutsche Bank AG
"The payout ratio, it's got to go down," said the bank's co-Chief Executive Anshu Jain about the level of bonuses. "Employees must make their contribution."
|Domestic Market Reports|
|Tokyo's Nikkei share average closes down 0.35 pct||17 Mar, 2014|
|European Factors to Watch-Shares seen down after Crimea vote||17 Mar, 2014|
|GLOBAL MARKETS-Shares hit as Crimea vote to spur sanctions against Moscow||17 Mar, 2014|
|Singapore shares rebound on positive trade data||17 Mar, 2014|
|China shares gain on urbanisation plans, Hong Kong falls to 5-week low||17 Mar, 2014|
|Nikkei choppy on Ukraine anxiety; SoftBank soars on Alibaba news||17 Mar, 2014|
|ADVISORY-Indian markets closed on Monday for public holiday||17 Mar, 2014|
|ADVISORY-Indian markets closed on Monday for public holiday||17 Mar, 2014|
|The potential game-changers||17 Mar, 2014|
|Tech Mahindra gains; RBI allows hike in FII limit||17 Mar, 2014|
|International Market Reports|
|Wall St ends lower on jitters over upcoming Crimea vote||17 Mar, 2014|
|Hong Kong shares suffer worst week since May 2012||17 Mar, 2014|
|Asian stocks stumble, yen pulls ahead on Ukraine anxiety||17 Mar, 2014|
|Nikkei slides 3.3 pct as Ukraine, China anxiety sees biggest weekly drop in 9 months||17 Mar, 2014|
|Singapore index weakens, but Olam lends support||17 Mar, 2014|
|Nikkei slides to 1-mth low on strong yen as Ukraine, China woes unnerve investors||17 Mar, 2014|
|Europe shares pause after sell-off; Morrison sinks||17 Mar, 2014|
|European shares edge higher, Lufthansa takes off||17 Mar, 2014|
|Nikkei hits 1-1/2-week low after Chinese data disappoints||17 Mar, 2014|
|Hong Kong shares fall after weak China data, Chinese banks firm||17 Mar, 2014|
|BSE - Mar 14, 12:00 AM||A B1 B2|
|L&T Finance Hol||
|Lanco Global Sy||
|H C L Infosyste||
|Click here for more|