A misguided traveller or a zealous missionary, John Allen Chau was killed in the process of making contact with the Sentinelese, an Andaman tribe so reclusive they shot at an Indian Coast Guard helicopter that came to check on them after the 2004 tsunami. A couple of centuries ago, even the British gave up trying to make inroads into the island.Around the same time, the video of a baby bear scaling a cliff to join its mother went viral. A closer look at the video suggests that the cub may have nearly died because of the drone circling around it.
“Chau’s fateful expedition has caused widespread outrage in Hindu-majority India, where Christian evangelicals are often viewed with anger or suspicion. Critics say his brazen violation of Indian law was selfish and put the fragile tribe at risk – potentially exposing them to modern diseases for which they have no immunity.” Chau was no evangelist. He was a thrill-seeker with delusions of grandeur as the chosen tool of Jesus Christ. And his violation of law was not simply “selfish” – it was dangerous, it was illegal, and it has caused a crisis. It doesn’t take a “critic” to figure that out. It takes logic. Now that the Sentinelese are back in focus for the first time since 2004 – when the Coast Guard shot the famous picture of a couple of tribesmen aiming arrows at a relief helicopter – various articles have been published about attempts to contact them. A British expedition in 1880, with the twin weapons of novelty and gunpowder, managed to take six Sentinelese captives, of whom two died and four were released back into the island. The Anthropological Survey of India has been sending contact parties from 1967 to 1991, with only the last attempt leading to some success. Subsequently, the Indian government made what seems to be a sensible decision to prevent all contact with the tribe, even for academic purposes, to spare them from diseases from the newer world – which had begun to affect other tribes in the Andamans. The 2011 census counted just fifteen Sentinelese on the island, though the numbers are not foolproof, since the survey was carried out from a distance. Chau has endangered the health of the tribe, as well as the freedom of the fishermen whom he bribed to take him to the island. Combined with his missionary zeal was the colonising mentality of the new world, the false sense of heroism in trespassing – not much different from the Crusaders of centuries ago. Instead of gunpowder, he carried germs. And just as his selfish ends may have served to endanger people who were minding their own business, photographer Dmitry Kedrov’s quest for YouTube fame may have caused the near death of a bear cub. His viral video shows a baby bear sliding down and climbing up a steep mountain wall near Russia’s Sea of Okhotsk. Scientists suggested the noise and sight of the drone may have scared the mother bear into crossing treacherous terrain with her baby. Worse, the drone appears to suddenly fly extremely close to the mother and cub, just as the baby is about to reach safety. The mother bear looks directly at the drone and swats the air, immediately after which the cub slides almost to the bottom of the cliff. Kedrov claimed the zoom was a post-production effect, but that allows no explanation for the mother bear’s reaction, and the baby’s ability to climb to safety once the drone is some distance away. As if our encroachment into the wild, with our industries and exploration were not enough, now we come bearing drones and Bibles. Perhaps this is one area where science and religion can see eye-to-eye – the mission to map the world, to bring every inch of it under “civilisation”. Never mind that most animal species have survived longer than we have. Never mind that a tribe with no knowledge of money or religion has seen an estimated 60,000 summers and winters. Neither science nor religion believes nature should be free to run its course. Our exploration of mountains and seas, our digging up of graves and pyramids, our interference with mankind and animals and nature, are all driven by the desire to know, and the desire for credit. So it is that the tomb of a young pharaoh has been broken into its constituent pieces and put on display. So it is that smaller and cheaper drones are available for the most ill-informed to venture into wildlife habitats. So it is that a 26-year-old tourist turned predator into a forbidden island. The hostility does not come from tribes and terrain and wildlife. It comes from us, savages with books and coconuts and supermarkets to stock and black markets to exploit. More Columns by Nandini Krishnan:
India's #MeToo: A moment of reckoning
Of Swachch Bharat and scavenging
LGBTQIA rights have a long way to go
V S Naipaul: The man the world loved to hate
The legacy of Karunanidhi
"Rapistan": There are no safe places
The "most dangerous country" poll should not make us defensive
The illusion of secularism
When hooliganism is state-sanctioned
Tarun Tejpal case: When the media plays jury
Karnataka: Death of democracy
India shining as ecosystems die?
Tamil Nadu: The land of the lawless
When death does not deter
Power play at a time of crisis
A country in denial
The gods have left the temples
What cricketers' reactions to ball-tampering show
Even Chhota Bheem knows our data was never private
No Confidence Motion: Why is the BJP nervous?
Do we really have the right to die with dignity?
Democracy has no place for mobs Women will drive Ayyappa away, but not violence?