A Division Bench, headed by Justice Arun Mishra, said the matter was being referred to a three-judge Bench for further hearing on next week.
The Centre stated that the judgment diluting the stringent provision of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that arrest on a complaint under the law was not mandatory had "seriously affected their (SC/ST) morale and confidence in the ability of the state to protect them".
Article 21, which guarantees protection of life and personal liberty, says: "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by the law."
While ruling that there would be no mandatory arrest of an accused on a complaint under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the apex court by its March 20 judgement had directed "...in absence of any other independent offence calling for arrest, in respect of offences under the Atrocities Act, no arrest may be effected" without the permission of appointing authority in case of public servant or that of Senior Superintendent of Police in case of general public".
The court had said it was providing the safeguard "in view of acknowledged abuse of law of arrest" under the Act.
"It's necessary to express concern that working of the Atrocities Act should not result in perpetuating casteism, which can have an adverse impact on integration of the society and the constitutional values," it said.